[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Partitions are a logical construct which divide available resources. By default, a given job may only utilize resources within a single partition and any resource (i.e., compute node) may only be associated with a single partition. In general, partitions are organized along physical or political boundaries. For example, a cluster may consist of 256 nodes containing four 64 port switches. This cluster may receive excellent interprocess communication speeds for parallel job tasks located within the same switch but sub-stellar performance for tasks which span switches. To handle this, the site may choose to create four partitions, allowing jobs to run within any of the four partitions but not span them.
While partitions do have value, it is important to note that within Maui, the standing reservation facility provides significantly improved flexibility and should be used in the vast majority of cases where partitions are required under other resource management systems. Standing reservations provide time flexibility, improved access control features, and more extended resource specification options. Also, another Maui facility called Node sets allows intelligent aggregation of resources to improve per job node allocation decisions. In cases where system partitioning is considered for such reasons, node sets may be able to provide a better solution.
Still, one key advantage of partitions over standing reservations and node sets is the ability to specify partition specific policies, limits, priorities, and scheduling algorithms although this feature is rarely required. An example of this need may be a cluster consisting of 48 nodes owned by the Astronomy Department and 16 nodes owned by the Mathematics Department. Each department may be willing to allow sharing of resources but wants to specify how their partition will be used. As mentioned earlier, many of Maui's scheduling policies may be specified on a per partition basis allowing each department to control the scheduling goals within their partition.
The partition associated with each node must be specified as indicated in the Node Location section. With this done, partition access lists may be specified on a per job or per QOS basis to constrain which resources a job may have access to (See the QOS Overview for more information). By default, QOS's and jobs allow global partition access.
If no partition is specified, Maui creates a single partition named 'DEFAULT' into which all resources are placed. In addition to the DEFAULT partition, a pseudo-partition named '[ALL] ' is created which contains the aggregate resources of all partitions. NOTE: While DEFAULT is a real partition containing all resources not explicitly assigned to another partition, the [ALL] partition is only a convenience construct and is not a real partition; thus it cannot be requested by jobs or included in configuration ACL's.
7.2.1 Defining Partitions
Node to partition mappings are established using the NODECFG parameter as shown in the example below.
NOTE: By default, Maui only allows the creation of 4 partitions
total. Two of these partitions, DEFAULT, and [ALL], are
used internally, leaving only two additional partition definition slots available.
If more partitions will be needed, the maximum partition count should
be adjusted. See Appendix D, Adjusting
Default Limits, for information on increasing the maximum number of partitions.
Partions can easily be created for by the Moab Cluster ManagerTM for systems using the Moab Workload ManagerTM.
7.2.2 Managing Partition Access
Determining who can use which partition is specified using the *CFG parameters (USERCFG , GROUPCFG , ACCOUNTCFG , QOSCFG , CLASSCFG , and SYSTEMCFG ). These parameters allow both a partition access list and default partition to be selected on a credential or system wide basis using the PLIST and PDEF keywords. By default, the access associated with any given job is the logical or of all partition access lists assigned to the job's credentials. Assume a site with two partitions, general, and test. The site management would like everybody to use the general partition by default. However, one user, steve, needs to perform the majority of his work on the test partition. Two special groups, staff and mgmt will also need access to use the test partition from time to time but will perform most of their work in the general partition. The example configuration below will enable the needed user and group access and defaults for this site.
USERCFG[steve] PLIST=general:test PDEF=test
GROUPCFG[staff] PLIST=general:test PDEF=general
GROUPCFG[mgmt] PLIST=general:test PDEF=general
NOTE: By default, the system partition access list allows global access to all partitions. If using logically or based partition access lists, the system partition list should be explicitly constrained using the SYSCFG parameter.
While using a logical or approach allows sites to add access to certain jobs, some sites prefer to work the other way around. In these cases, access is granted by default and certain credentials are then restricted from access various partitions. To use this model, a system partition list must be specified. See the example below:
7.2.3 Requesting Partitions
Users may request to use any partition they have access
to on a per job basis. This is accomplished using the resource manager
extensions since most native batch systems do not support the partition
concept. For example, on a PBS system, a job submitted by a member of
the group staff could request that the job run in the test partition by adding
the line '#PBS -W x=PARTITION:test' to the command file. See
the resource manager extension overview
for more information on configuring and utilizing resource manager extensions.
7.2.4 Miscellaneous Partition Issues
Special jobs may be allowed to span the resources of multiple partitions if desired by associating the job with a QOS which has the flag 'SPAN' set. (See the QOSCFG parameter)
A brief caution, use of partitions has been quite limited in recent years as other, more effective approaches are selected for site scheduling policies. Consequently, some aspects of partitions have received only minor testing. Still note that partitions are fully supported and any problem found will be rectified.
Standing Reservations, Node Sets [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]