[torqueusers] upgrade from 4.1.x to 4.2.x

Steven Lo slo at cacr.caltech.edu
Tue Dec 3 13:48:33 MST 2013


Hi David,

Thanks for the confirmation.

Steven.


On 12/03/2013 12:44 PM, David Beer wrote:
> Steven,
>
> That is correct. You only need to patch pbs_server.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Steven Lo <slo at cacr.caltech.edu 
> <mailto:slo at cacr.caltech.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     I figured out how to grab the commit as suggested. Thanks.
>
>     BTW, this patch is to fix srv_mail.c, does it means that it will
>     only affect pbs_server only and
>     NOT pbs_mom and trqauthd.  Just want to confirm so that we can
>     save some work without
>     touching all compute nodes.
>
>     Thanks.
>
>     Steven.
>
>
>
>     On 12/03/2013 11:02 AM, Steven Lo wrote:
>>
>>     Hi David,
>>
>>     Thanks for the info.
>>
>>     I'm not really familiar with GIT.  How do I grab the commit as
>>     suggested?  Is there other way
>>     to get the patch?
>>
>>     Thanks.
>>
>>     Steven.
>>
>>
>>     On 12/02/2013 08:33 AM, David Beer wrote:
>>>     This isn't fixed in 4.1.7 because 4.1.7 came out first. To get
>>>     the fix for 4.1, grab this commit:
>>>     2aad72c3d2ac612ecbb66828ac6ed5ab51eff5f3
>>>
>>>     There are a lot of differences between 4.2 and 4.1, including
>>>     moving to a g++ compiler for 4.2. The release notes can be found
>>>     here:
>>>     https://www.adaptivecomputing.com/wp-content/uploads/releasenotes/releaseNotesTORQUE-4.2.0.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Steven Lo <slo at cacr.caltech.edu
>>>     <mailto:slo at cacr.caltech.edu>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>         Hi,
>>>
>>>         We just upgraded our Torque to 4.1.5.1 not too long ago and
>>>         we need to
>>>         do another upgrade
>>>         due to the vulnerability cv3-2013-4495
>>>
>>>         http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:jExSd2QWrbgJ:web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail%3FvulnId%3DCVE-2013-4495+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
>>>
>>>         What's major different between 4.1 and 4.2?  Is there any
>>>         benefit of
>>>         going from 4.1 to 4.2?
>>>
>>>         Do we know the vulnerability exist in 4.1.5.1 and is fixed
>>>         in 4.1.7?
>>>
>>>         Thanks.
>>>
>>>         Steven.
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         torqueusers mailing list
>>>         torqueusers at supercluster.org
>>>         <mailto:torqueusers at supercluster.org>
>>>         http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>     David Beer | Senior Software Engineer
>>>     Adaptive Computing
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     torqueusers mailing list
>>>     torqueusers at supercluster.org  <mailto:torqueusers at supercluster.org>
>>>     http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     torqueusers mailing list
>     torqueusers at supercluster.org <mailto:torqueusers at supercluster.org>
>     http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> David Beer | Senior Software Engineer
> Adaptive Computing
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20131203/b54d4714/attachment.html 


More information about the torqueusers mailing list