[torqueusers] 2.5.3 release candidate
dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com
Mon Oct 4 08:48:28 MDT 2010
> isn't this kind of a big change to make in a 'fix' release? In my
> opinion something like this should be in a 2.6.0 release, especially
> since it is non-optional.
I'm not against holding it for 2.6, but I do want to point out that this would be optional. You would have to configure TORQUE to use munge.
David Beer | Senior Software Engineer
More information about the torqueusers