[torqueusers] torque does not kill jobs when wall_time or cpu_time reached

Ken Nielson knielson at adaptivecomputing.com
Mon Jun 7 09:02:42 MDT 2010

On 06/04/2010 08:14 PM, Glen Beane wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:37 PM, David Singleton
> <David.Singleton at anu.edu.au>  wrote:
>> If procs is going to mean processors/cpus then I would suggest there needs
>> to be a lot of code added to align nodes and procs - they are specifying
>> the same thing.
> Moab treats them the same if you do not specify ppn with your nodes
> request, however TORQUE is pretty much unaware of what -l procs=X
> means - it just passes the info along to Moab. I would like to see
> procs become a real torque resource that means give me X total
> processors on anywhere from 1 to X nodes.
> _______________________________________________
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
Currently Moab interprets procs to mean give me all the processors on X 


More information about the torqueusers mailing list