jbernstein at penguincomputing.com
Wed Jul 21 12:29:59 MDT 2010
Setting that last parameter shouldn't be problem. We've used it
successfully on diskless systems for years, though I haven't yet tested
it with 2.5.0.
Albino A. Aveleda wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> Ok. But I have added the last line in my configuration and
> I haven´t tested yet.
> ----- Mensagem original -----
> De: "Ken Nielson" <knielson at adaptivecomputing.com>
> Para: torqueusers at supercluster.org
> Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 21 de Julho de 2010 11:28:29
> Assunto: Re: [torqueusers] diskless
> On 07/21/2010 08:10 AM, Albino A. Aveleda wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> I have a cluster with diskless nodes and NFS. I am going to
>> upgrade to torque 2.5.0.
>> I would like to know if the MOM configuration below is good
>> to diskless nodes.
>> --- /var/spool/torque/mom_priv/config ---
>> $logevent 0x0
>> $loglevel 0
>> $spool_as_final_name true
>> --- end file ---
>> Best regards,
> If you already have TORQUE working with your current diskless system
> then what you have here should not create any problems when you upgrade
> to 2.5.0.
> Ken Nielson
> Adaptive Computing
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
More information about the torqueusers