[torqueusers] Upgrade from 2.1.*

Glen Beane glen.beane at gmail.com
Tue Aug 17 18:46:53 MDT 2010


Sorry for the top post (on my phone), but what about storing the server and job info in an SQLite (or similar) database? 


On Aug 17, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Ken Nielson <knielson at adaptivecomputing.com> wrote:

> On 08/17/2010 03:02 PM, Ken Nielson wrote:
>> 
>> On 08/17/2010 03:01 PM, Garrick Staples wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:59:19PM -0600, Ken Nielson alleged:
>>>   
>>>> On 08/17/2010 12:14 PM, Glen Beane wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>> that would be good.  Although I'd really love to get rid of just
>>>>> dumping the struct right to disk and have something that can be
>>>>> extended without jumping through hoops to maintain compatibility.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    
>>>>>       
>>>> Did I hear XML?
>>>> 
>>>> serverdb is now an XML file in trunk. How about job files as well?
>>>>     
>>> How badly was performance affected with the XML change?
>>> 
>>>   
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> torqueusers mailing list
>>> torqueusers at supercluster.org
>>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>>>   
>> We really need to measure it. But it does not seem to have a noticeable impact on the systems where the trunk code is currently running.
>> 
>> Ken
> 
> Confession time. 
> 
> It is in the 3.0 code base but it has not yet been moved to trunk. However, because the information of serverdb is cached
> the hit on performance is negligible.
> 
> We will be moving the code into trunk soon as well.
> 
> Ken
> _______________________________________________
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20100817/d2a205bd/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the torqueusers mailing list