[torqueusers] Upgrade from 2.1.*
garrick at usc.edu
Tue Aug 17 17:26:59 MDT 2010
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:18:58PM -0700, Joshua Bernstein alleged:
> Ken Nielson wrote:
> > On 08/17/2010 12:14 PM, Glen Beane wrote:
> >> that would be good. Although I'd really love to get rid of just
> >> dumping the struct right to disk and have something that can be
> >> extended without jumping through hoops to maintain compatibility.
> > Did I hear XML?
> > serverdb is now an XML file in trunk. How about job files as well?
> No. I'm not in favor of doing something like this. Imagine a third party
> application, say like PBSQuery having now to parse XML!
PBSQuery reads the job files? Why would it do that?
> It might work well for the small systems you guys mess around on, but
> I'd really like us all to consider what happens when hundreds of
> thousands of jobs are present, as even with the current implementation
> things are uberslow sometimes.
Obviously one doesn't just throw XML out there in the wild polluting the place.
One releases the associated tools and libraries to read/write the XML.
This data is only ever read when pbs_server starts. Read performance isn't
important. We only care about write performance.
Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin
University of Southern California
Life is Good!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20100817/5554a9cd/attachment.bin
More information about the torqueusers