[torqueusers] Upgrade from 2.1.*

Ken Nielson knielson at adaptivecomputing.com
Tue Aug 17 15:57:21 MDT 2010


On 08/17/2010 03:02 PM, Ken Nielson wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 03:01 PM, Garrick Staples wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 02:59:19PM -0600, Ken Nielson alleged:
>>    
>>> On 08/17/2010 12:14 PM, Glen Beane wrote:
>>>      
>>>> that would be good.  Although I'd really love to get rid of just
>>>> dumping the struct right to disk and have something that can be
>>>> extended without jumping through hoops to maintain compatibility.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> Did I hear XML?
>>>
>>> serverdb is now an XML file in trunk. How about job files as well?
>>>      
>> How badly was performance affected with the XML change?
>>
>>    
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> torqueusers mailing list
>> torqueusers at supercluster.org
>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>>    
> We really need to measure it. But it does not seem to have a 
> noticeable impact on the systems where the trunk code is currently 
> running.
>
> Ken

Confession time.

It is in the 3.0 code base but it has not yet been moved to trunk. 
However, because the information of serverdb is cached
the hit on performance is negligible.

We will be moving the code into trunk soon as well.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20100817/9bc13462/attachment.html 


More information about the torqueusers mailing list