[torqueusers] [torquedev] Change in interactive job behavior from previous torque versions.
Joshua Bernstein
jbernstein at penguincomputing.com
Wed Apr 14 12:56:36 MDT 2010
Agreed,
I had three people last week asked why this was changed.
-Josh
Glen Beane wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:45 PM, David Beer <dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com
> <mailto:dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com>> wrote:
>
> I talked to the developers who worked on this, and they assumed that
> submitting qsub -I pbsi.sh would just ignore pbsi.sh, so they
> thought this wouldn't changed the behavior. I will try to resolve this.
>
>
>
> this change in behavior is still catching torque users off guard. I
> think the change should be backed out and the devs that added this need
> to find a different way to accomplish what they need (maybe a new
> command line argument and not hijack the -I argument)
>
> -glen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> torquedev mailing list
> torquedev at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torquedev
More information about the torqueusers
mailing list