[torqueusers] Soname went back in time
garrick at usc.edu
Fri Nov 14 11:09:01 MST 2008
I think the best way forward is to avoid the tricky hacks in torque. Just
keep things the way they are and deal with it.
I guess that most sites use 2.0/2.1; they won't run into this problem. I
suspect very few sites run 2.2. I suspect the sites with 2.3 are actively
upgrading and following the releases.
That said, I don't see how the original release to bump the somajor isn't a
legit concern? The arguements of public functions changed. How is that not an
incompatible ABI change?
Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin
University of Southern California
Revoke LDS Church 501(c)(3) Status - http://lds501c3.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20081114/c568c764/attachment.bin
More information about the torqueusers