[torqueusers] Evaluating DRMAA + Torque
Darren Platt
darren at 23andme.com
Sat May 31 15:27:28 MDT 2008
Hi,
we've been testing out Torque + DRMAA combination and using DRMAA-py that
was written for SGE. I've
encountered a few issues and was wondering if there are many users out there
using Torque+DRMAA. The underlying
Torque implementation seems to be behaving correctly, but I've had a lot of
issues trying to get input/output files to stage
correctly using scp. I ran into some slight problems compiling the python
wrappers as well that required a small addition to
the torque/DRMAA headers. Has anyone used DRMAA-py with Torque? Any
comments appreciated. We're testing
a variety of different schedulers and I was impressed with the relative ease
of installation for Torque. The docs were a little out
of date in places, but overall good. We're testing 2.3.0,
Thanks,
--
Darren Platt
Senior Director, Research
23andMe, inc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20080531/5feca4d7/attachment.html
More information about the torqueusers
mailing list