[torqueusers] Re: qsub problem in 2.3.2?
msbritt at umich.edu
Sun Aug 10 20:09:43 MDT 2008
We're not running 2.3.2 in production yet, but my quick test of 2.3.2
(and your example) didn't show any problems (I received the requested
On Aug 9, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Tom Rudwick wrote:
> Hello? (tap tap)
> I guess nobody is running 2.3.x
> Probably a wise decision.
> Tom Rudwick wrote:
>> Is it just us, or did this break in 2.3.2?
>> qsub -l mem=5gb test
>> When we do this with 2.3.1, we get a job with 5gb memory allocation.
>> When we do this with 2.3.2, we get a job with the server default
>> memory allocation.
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
More information about the torqueusers