[torqueusers] Re: qsub problem in 2.3.2?
josh at clusterresources.com
Mon Aug 11 07:59:09 MDT 2008
We've had no reported problems similar to yours in 2.3.2. Several sites have been using 2.3.2
without any problems.
Tom Rudwick wrote:
> Hello? (tap tap)
> I guess nobody is running 2.3.x
> Probably a wise decision.
> Tom Rudwick wrote:
>> Is it just us, or did this break in 2.3.2?
>> qsub -l mem=5gb test
>> When we do this with 2.3.1, we get a job with 5gb memory allocation.
>> When we do this with 2.3.2, we get a job with the server default
>> memory allocation.
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
More information about the torqueusers