[torqueusers] Re: qsub problem in 2.3.2?
tomr at intrinsity.com
Sun Aug 10 20:16:20 MDT 2008
We'll have to try to figure out why we are seeing that problem. Maybe
there is something wrong with our build/installation process.
Matthew Britt wrote:
> We're not running 2.3.2 in production yet, but my quick test of 2.3.2
> (and your example) didn't show any problems (I received the requested
> memory allocation).
> - matt
> On Aug 9, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Tom Rudwick wrote:
>> Hello? (tap tap)
>> I guess nobody is running 2.3.x
>> Probably a wise decision.
>> Tom Rudwick wrote:
>>> Is it just us, or did this break in 2.3.2?
>>> qsub -l mem=5gb test
>>> When we do this with 2.3.1, we get a job with 5gb memory allocation.
>>> When we do this with 2.3.2, we get a job with the server default
>>> memory allocation.
>> torqueusers mailing list
>> torqueusers at supercluster.org
More information about the torqueusers