[torqueusers] Re: qsub problem in 2.3.2?
tomr at intrinsity.com
Sat Aug 9 18:36:54 MDT 2008
Hello? (tap tap)
I guess nobody is running 2.3.x
Probably a wise decision.
Tom Rudwick wrote:
> Is it just us, or did this break in 2.3.2?
> qsub -l mem=5gb test
> When we do this with 2.3.1, we get a job with 5gb memory allocation.
> When we do this with 2.3.2, we get a job with the server default memory
More information about the torqueusers