[torqueusers] Re: qsub problem in 2.3.2?

[Tom Rudwick]

Hello? (tap tap)
I guess nobody is running 2.3.x
Probably a wise decision.

Tom


Tom Rudwick wrote:
> Is it just us, or did this break in 2.3.2?
> 
> qsub -l mem=5gb test
> 
> When we do this with 2.3.1, we get a job with 5gb memory allocation.
> 
> When we do this with 2.3.2, we get a job with the server default memory 
> allocation.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
>