[torqueusers] Re: [Mauiusers] scheduling = false + maui

[Donald Tripp]

I guess the other option would be to set all the nodes as "down".


- Donald Tripp
  dtripp at hawaii.edu
----------------------------------------------
HPC Systems Administrator
High Performance Computing Center
University of Hawai'i at Hilo
200 W. Kawili Street
Hilo,   Hawaii   96720
http://www.hpc.uhh.hawaii.edu


On Oct 25, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Sam Rash wrote:

> Thx, this is the preferred behavior.  "put the cluster on hold"  
> such that no
> further execution will take place beyond that at the moment (and  
> the RM can
> still send the scheduler information w/o errors)
>
> And mschedctl is moab's schedctl I presume.
>
>
> Sam Rash
> srash at yahoo-inc.com
> 408-349-7312
> vertigosr37
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wightman [mailto:wightman at clusterresources.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1:40 PM
> To: Justin Bronder
> Cc: Sam Rash; torqueusers at supercluster.org; mauiusers at supercluster.org
> Subject: Re: [torqueusers] Re: [Mauiusers] scheduling = false + maui
>
> Pausing the scheduler (Moab) is actually different from stopping the
> scheduler.  A paused scheduler will continue to read in resource  
> manager
> information but will not schedule any jobs.  Stopping the scheduler
> results in Moab not reading in any new resource manager  
> information, it
> only responds to client commands.
>
> I've only done the "scheduling=false" once per installtion to make  
> sure
> pbs_sched never does a thing.  From then on, if I want to stop
> scheduling I just issue "mschedctl -s" or mschedctl -p".
>
> - Douglas
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 16:11 -0400, Justin Bronder wrote:
>> We use Moab here and just pausing Moab has the effect of keeping all
>> new
>> jobs from running while allowing people to still add to the  
>> queue.  It
>> appears
>> from the documentation that schedctl -s has the same effect as the
>> mschedctl -p that I use.  However, this doesn't spam any of my Torque
>> logs.
>>
>> -Justin.
>>
>> On 10/25/06, Garrick Staples <garrick at clusterresources.com> wrote:
>>         On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:51:31PM -0700, Sam Rash alleged:
>>> What is the preferred method of putting a cluster on 'hold'
>>         with torque +
>>> maui?
>>
>>         I just kill maui.
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         torqueusers mailing list
>>         torqueusers at supercluster.org
>>         http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> torqueusers mailing list
>> torqueusers at supercluster.org
>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> torqueusers mailing list
> torqueusers at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20061025/40474caa/attachment.html