[torqueusers] scheduling priorities

[Chris Samuel]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 04:04 am, Michael T. Campbell wrote:

> Thank you for your response.  This is similar to the example that I have
> found in the moab.cfg file, but it did not seem to really do anything.  
> According to "showq -i", these groups aren't getting any boost in
> priority at all - which prompted my original question.

Ahh, it was doing something, but...

> It was the specification of GROUPWEIGHT that was  the key. After setting
> this it seems to work great.

...you need that as well to get it taken into account in the queue priority.

Mea culpa! :-)

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Systems & Network Admin
 Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/
 Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torqueusers/attachments/20050318/6c8f7de3/attachment.bin