[torquedev] [torqueusers] 2.5.3 release candidate
knielson at adaptivecomputing.com
Mon Oct 4 10:18:20 MDT 2010
On 10/04/2010 08:55 AM, Glen Beane wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Beer<dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com> wrote:
>>> isn't this kind of a big change to make in a 'fix' release? In my
>>> opinion something like this should be in a 2.6.0 release, especially
>>> since it is non-optional.
>> I'm not against holding it for 2.6, but I do want to point out that this would be optional. You would have to configure TORQUE to use munge.
> I wasn't talking about munch. I am fine with that, since it is
> optional. I was talking about the conversion of the server DB to
> xml. That is a pretty big change, and while it has been tested for a
> while, it may still be a little scary to cluster admins and could keep
> a lot of people from moving forward in the 2.5.x branch for a while.
What if we make the xml serverdb optional in 2.5.3?
The XML format is a nice feature from a support point of view as well as
an administrative. It would be nice to have it available before our next
More information about the torquedev