[torquedev] [Bug 93] Resource management semantics of Torque need to be well defined

bugzilla-daemon at supercluster.org bugzilla-daemon at supercluster.org
Mon Nov 1 05:16:10 MDT 2010


--- Comment #11 from Simon Toth <SimonT at mail.muni.cz> 2010-11-01 05:16:10 MDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> If you are using cpusets then it is processors per node in that your job is
> constrained to just the cpus you requested.

Yeah. I'm not talking about what is achievable with the current semantics.
Sure, you can done pretty much everything with the current semantics (and that
is something that has to be maintained). This is more about cleanup and

Configure bugmail: http://www.clusterresources.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the torquedev mailing list