[torquedev] Proposed Patch
SimonT at mail.muni.cz
Wed Mar 17 02:31:08 MDT 2010
>> While more internal testing via Adaptive is a good thing,
>> it can't possibly match the different uses by the community. For example, would
>> AC, thought of testing the qsub -I usage that Brock Palen pointed on on the
>> users' list? They figured it "wouldn't break anything" but it turns out
>> something did in fact change.
>> I guess that as long as the community continues to be involved with the test and
>> release cycle,
> Can I ask what kind of automated testing is done for Torque?
> With the advent of virtualising, it should be possible to build a test
> framework, to test as many
> things work as possible. Once a suitable framework is in place, its easy
> to require that any new
> fix or feature includes a suitable testcase.
We are using LXC (Light Linux Containers) to create virtual grids with
hundreds of nodes on a single PC and then use this grid for performance
and stability testing.
Its not a formal tool, more of a playground, but its good enough for us
Mgr. Simon Toth
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3366 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20100317/eb3e1b07/attachment.bin
More information about the torquedev