[torquedev] preemption and dedicated nodes

Garrick Staples garrick at usc.edu
Fri Jun 18 11:26:09 MDT 2010

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:03:59AM +1000, Christopher Samuel alleged:
> Hash: SHA1
> On 17/06/10 08:49, Garrick Staples wrote:
> > Would anyone like my fix (so far)? I also fixed a second
> > problem in torque which is that preemptee jobs are just
> > SIGKILL'd instead of given a reasonable SIGTERM, followed
> > by kill_delay'd SIGKILL.
> Sounds good to me (though never had to use preemption to date).

Me neither. Boss wants a "kill queue" now.

Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin
University of Southern California

Life is Good!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20100618/f7c74c74/attachment.bin 

More information about the torquedev mailing list