[torquedev] Torque Semantics
"Mgr. Šimon Tóth"
SimonT at mail.muni.cz
Fri Jun 11 03:30:55 MDT 2010
I think, that we have a problem with poorly defined semantics. There
should be a separate document describing what exactly does Torque
consider, what parts of Torque are affected and how.
For example requests like -l mem=1G are ignored during the scheduling
process, but enforced on the node.
We should ignore any behaviour that is produced by external schedulers
that are designed to run in 1:1 (server:scheduler) configuration,
because such schedulers override Torque semantics by sending very
specific job run requests.
Mgr. Šimon Tóth
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3366 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20100611/eadf38bb/attachment.bin
More information about the torquedev