[torquedev] nodes, procs, tpn and ncpus
glen.beane at gmail.com
Wed Jun 9 19:53:46 MDT 2010
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Garrick Staples <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:52:08PM -0400, Glen Beane alleged:
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Garrick Staples <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:
>> > I know I'm getting in on this conversation late, but here is my fantasy:
>> > nodes=X gives X number of cpus. Packed. Your job is CPU bound and you don't
>> > care how they are packed.
>> blah. that is overloading the meaning of nodes. I like the new
>> procs=X instead. It basically means the same thing, you get X
>> processors, moab seems to pack them on as few nodes as possible.
>> TORQUE doesn't do anything with procs yet...
> Nothing is overloaded. "nodes" has always translated to "vnodes" inside of
> torque. If you don't specify ppn, then you don't care about where your
> processors land. Perfectly logical. This case also covers the vast majority of
>> > nodes=X:ppn=Y gives you X unique nodes with Y cpus per machine. Not-packed.
>> > This lets you spread IO around because you know you need it.
>> here is what I want
>> procs=X gives you X processors, user doesn't care about layout (hack that
>> works with Moab, should be made to work properly with pbs_sched/qrun)
>> nodes=X:ppn=Y gives you exactly X unique nodes with Y processors per node
>> nodes=X - I'm not sure about this one, but to preserve historic behavior I
>> think TORQUE should give you X nodes with one processor on each node (Moab
>> can have an option to treat it like procs=X, which is the current behavior)
>> _______________________________________________ torquedev mailing list
> Getting torque to jive procs with nodes is a lot more work.
> My plan is easy, simple, and I think covers everyone's use cases.
> Everyone has always wanted "gimme X cores, anywhere". The solution is to not
> use EXACTNODE and "nodes=X" does what you want. But EXACTNODE breaks the
> "nodes=X:ppn=y" case. If we just change maui/moab to not pack jobs with ppn,
> then we are done.
Pretend Maui/Moab doesn't exist right now. There is no way to do
"gimme X cores, anywhere" right? What we're talking about is adding a
way to do that in TORQUE without scheduling hacks.
I'm already done because I use EXACTNODE and I use procs=X when I want
X processors and I don't care where they end up, and I use
nodes=X:ppn=Y if I do. But it would be nice if TORQUE knew what to do
More information about the torquedev