[torquedev] 2.5 Release
Ken Nielson
knielson at adaptivecomputing.com
Wed Jul 14 17:13:10 MDT 2010
The link to the change log can be found at http://www.clusterresources.com/products/torque/docs/
It is at the top of the documentation page.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Bernstein" <jbernstein at penguincomputing.com>
To: "David Beer" <dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com>, "Torque Developers mailing list" <torquedev at supercluster.org>
Cc: "torquedev" <torquedev at adaptivecomputing.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 3:42:09 PM
Subject: Re: [torquedev] 2.5 Release
David Beer wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Please see below.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> David,
>>
>> I have no objections as our limited testing has been going well.
>> Though my thoughts would just be around clearly posting a CHANGELOG
>> or something similar as to what actually has been changed or fixed
>> from previous versions.
>>
>
> There is a README.array_changes file in the release (in fact it is in
> the beta, although it has been updated a little) and we will
> definitely post the CHANGELOG, probably in the email announcing the
> release. I believe that we have the CHANGELOGs for each release
> (including minor releases) posted somewhere on our website, but I
> know that doesn't replace the need for a community website.
>
>> In the past, we sometimes get this on post to the list, or if we're
>> lucky a CHANGES file in the tarball, but ideally I'd like to see
>> something posted easy a website. Again, I'm making a point for a
>> community website here.
I thought they were on your website as well. Though I've yet to find
them. I think I can speak for the community is saying that we're growing
frustrated with the situation around this.
>> With the 2.5.0 release we have the opportunity to start fresh and
>> start to make some improvements around policy.
>>
>
> We know that we need a website, and we're working more on actually
> getting something out there. I can't give you a date yet, but I can
> tell you things are progressing better. How's that for
> politician-level clarity? Seriously though, we are hoping to have
> something soon.
I think I recall I brought this up at least over a year ago. Frankly at
this point, I'm happy to setup the site myself and volunteer to manage
it so as long as we as a developement team can agree to use it. The site
would house roadmaps, changelogs, and even bug tracking all tied
together! thoughts?
-Josh
_______________________________________________
torquedev mailing list
torquedev at supercluster.org
http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torquedev
More information about the torquedev
mailing list