[torquedev] "complete" jobs behavior

[Ken Nielson]

Glen Beane wrote:
> I have to say I am _not_ a fan of qdel'ed jobs going into the 
> "Complete" state.  (maybe starting in 2.4.x?)
> It makes no sense to me.  How can a job that didn't run and finish on 
> its own be considered "complete".?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> torquedev mailing list
> torquedev at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torquedev
>   
So should we add a 'D' state to confirm it has been deleted and then 
remove the job from the queue when the keep_completed interval expires?

Ken