[torquedev] Avoiding a full Torque fork

"Mgr. Šimon Tóth" SimonT at mail.muni.cz
Wed Dec 8 08:23:47 MST 2010

> Creating a new fork would certainly not be new. Garrick Staples has maintained and supported the 2.1 branch for quite some time.

The problem is that we are very aggressive with new features. We do
provide more stable version for sites that require stabler versions, but
generaly, we are trying to use the newest out there (specifically in our
experimental environment).

> Other opinions?

Sorry, this was not sent to the mailing list :)
It's in CC now.

> Ken
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "\"Mgr. Šimon Tóth\"" <SimonT at mail.muni.cz>
> To: "Ken Nielson" <knielson at adaptivecomputing.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 5:48:32 AM
> Subject: Avoiding a full Torque fork
> Hi,
> I'm really trying to avoid having a full Torque fork. We still have to
> maintain quite a lot of local features but I would really like to push
> everything that can be generally used into Torque.
> I understand that there is little time, but would it be possible to
> create a branch for us? Something like the yahoo branches? I would push
> all stable features into these branches (we are based on top 2.4 right now)..
> That way users can test our modified version of Torque (there are many
> requests for features that we support, or can trivially add).

Mgr. Šimon Tóth

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3366 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20101208/327f190f/attachment-0001.bin 

More information about the torquedev mailing list