[torquedev] [Bug 93] Resource management semantics of Torque need to be well defined
bugzilla-daemon at supercluster.org
bugzilla-daemon at supercluster.org
Tue Dec 7 07:44:51 MST 2010
http://www.clusterresources.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #19 from Glen <glen.beane at gmail.com> 2010-12-07 07:44:51 MST ---
I posted this in the torquedev thread generated by bugzilla for this bug:
2010/12/6 Michel Béland <michel.beland at rqchp.qc.ca>:
> Later, they introduced -lselect and deprecated -lnodes altogether. Now
> one can ask for -lselect=10:ncpus=8:mpiprocs=2:ompthread=4 to get the
> same result, if I remember correctly, but I think that I liked ppn and
> cpp better...
I remember there was talk from some of the TORQUE developers at
adaptive about adding a "select" statement to TORQUE. Whatever
happened to that? I think it would be great if we could add in a
select feature that is compatible (or at least mostly compatible) with
the PBS Pro select. Maybe Šimon Tóth's work could get us partially
there.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.clusterresources.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the torquedev
mailing list