[torquedev] [Bug 93] Resource management semantics of Torque need to be well defined

bugzilla-daemon at supercluster.org bugzilla-daemon at supercluster.org
Tue Dec 7 07:44:51 MST 2010


http://www.clusterresources.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93

--- Comment #19 from Glen <glen.beane at gmail.com> 2010-12-07 07:44:51 MST ---
I posted this in the torquedev thread generated by bugzilla for this bug:


2010/12/6 Michel Béland <michel.beland at rqchp.qc.ca>:

> Later, they introduced -lselect and deprecated -lnodes altogether. Now
> one can ask for -lselect=10:ncpus=8:mpiprocs=2:ompthread=4 to get the
> same result, if I remember correctly, but I think that I liked ppn and
> cpp better...


I remember there was talk from some of the TORQUE developers at
adaptive about adding a "select" statement to TORQUE.  Whatever
happened to that?  I think it would be great if we could add in a
select feature that is compatible (or at least mostly compatible) with
the PBS Pro select.  Maybe Šimon Tóth's work could get us partially
there.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.clusterresources.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the torquedev mailing list