[torquedev] [torqueusers] Change in interactive job behavior from previous torque versions.

Joshua Bernstein jbernstein at penguincomputing.com
Wed Apr 14 12:56:36 MDT 2010


Agreed,

I had three people last week asked why this was changed.

-Josh

Glen Beane wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:45 PM, David Beer <dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com 
> <mailto:dbeer at adaptivecomputing.com>> wrote:
> 
>     I talked to the developers who worked on this, and they assumed that
>     submitting qsub -I pbsi.sh would just ignore pbsi.sh, so they
>     thought this wouldn't changed the behavior. I will try to resolve this.
> 
> 
> 
> this change in behavior is still catching torque users off guard.  I 
> think the change should be backed out and the devs that added this need 
> to find a different way to accomplish what they need (maybe a new 
> command line argument and not hijack the -I argument)
> 
> -glen
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> torquedev mailing list
> torquedev at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torquedev


More information about the torquedev mailing list