[torquedev] binary change to .JB files in 2.3-fixes branch!
csamuel at vpac.org
Mon May 4 05:41:24 MDT 2009
----- "Josh Butikofer" <josh at clusterresources.com> wrote:
> Glen and everyone else who's interested:
Hiya! Oh stop groaning at the back.. ;-)
> Let me know if I'm wrong, but it seems the core of what you are
> suggesting is this:
> * TORQUE 2.3.x should not include anything but minor bug fixes.
Well, bug fixes in general, I'm not sure if they should just be minor!
> * All new features, enhancements, and more intrusive bug fixes should
> go into a non-stable branch, which is now called trunk.
Can I suggest instead:
* Non-intrusive (backwardly compatible) new features should get
added to a branch which would be 2.4.
* Major rewrites, changes that break backwards compatibility, etc,
should go into trunk and (eventually) become 3.0.
Hopefully that may strike a middle ground that would keep
both us devs (not that I've been much of a dev recently)
and the CR customers happy..
How does that sound to people ?
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
More information about the torquedev