[torquedev] pbsdsh and number of processors allocated
garrick at usc.edu
Fri Jun 19 07:00:53 MDT 2009
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:57:26PM +1000, Chris Samuel alleged:
> ----- "Garrick Staples" <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:
> > If we use a signal that defaults to ignore (like sigwinch),
> > then we don't have to worry about it.
> My bad, I meant to say that it'll be necessary to be
> able to choose not to have dynamic resizing of jobs,
> not the signal, sorry!
It would be up to the job to request job size changes. So no worries there.
Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin
University of Southern California
The pro-disease movement: http://www.jennymccarthybodycount.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20090619/6d33a209/attachment.bin
More information about the torquedev