[torquedev] pbsdsh and number of processors allocated

Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.org
Fri Jun 19 04:57:26 MDT 2009


----- "Garrick Staples" <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:

> If we use a signal that defaults to ignore (like sigwinch),
> then we don't have to worry about it.

My bad, I meant to say that it'll be necessary to be
able to choose not to have dynamic resizing of jobs,
not the signal, sorry!

cheers,
Chris
-- 
Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager
 The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
 P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency


More information about the torquedev mailing list