[torquedev] pbsdsh and number of processors allocated

Garrick Staples garrick at usc.edu
Fri Jun 19 00:56:01 MDT 2009


On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:55:11AM +1000, Chris Samuel alleged:
> 
> ----- "Garrick" <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:
> 
> > Nothing exists yet, but I imagine a signal would be necessary. Sighup 
> > would work but we should use something that doesn't default to  
> > terminate. Sigwinch would be funnily appropriate.
> 
> As long as there's a way to disable this for those
> applications which won't understand (which would be
> most I suspect).

If we use a signal that defaults to ignore (like sigwinch), then we don't have
to worry about it.

-- 
Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin
University of Southern California

The pro-disease movement: http://www.jennymccarthybodycount.com/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20090618/664d59e7/attachment.bin 


More information about the torquedev mailing list