[torquedev] pbsdsh and number of processors allocated
garrick at usc.edu
Fri Jun 19 00:56:01 MDT 2009
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:55:11AM +1000, Chris Samuel alleged:
> ----- "Garrick" <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:
> > Nothing exists yet, but I imagine a signal would be necessary. Sighup
> > would work but we should use something that doesn't default to
> > terminate. Sigwinch would be funnily appropriate.
> As long as there's a way to disable this for those
> applications which won't understand (which would be
> most I suspect).
If we use a signal that defaults to ignore (like sigwinch), then we don't have
to worry about it.
Garrick Staples, GNU/Linux HPCC SysAdmin
University of Southern California
The pro-disease movement: http://www.jennymccarthybodycount.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20090618/664d59e7/attachment.bin
More information about the torquedev