[torquedev] Versioning Issues & Development Roadmap
jbernstein at penguincomputing.com
Tue Jun 16 13:02:41 MDT 2009
Josh Butikofer wrote:
> See comments below:
>> should we make a list of all the 2.3 fixes that need to be merged?
>> Shouldn't bug fixes that go into 2.3-fixes get put into 2.4 right away
>> (and vice versa)? In 2.3-fixes I see a lot of CHANGELOG entries for
>> 2.3.7 but in trunk I see only a couple CHANGELOG entries for 2.3.7, so
>> that tells me most of those fixes need to be made in trunk as well
>> (or else they are logged as being fixed in 2.4.0 or 2.4.1 instead even
>> though those versions have never been released)
> We already have a list. I can send it out if you want. There are only a few
> changes that we are holding off on--we will bring those up on the mailing list
> before moving forward.
I don't think sending out the list is the proper thing to do. Now that there is
a bugzilla, the list should be available just through searching through BZ. We
can use the targets/milestones setting to show which bugs will move forward, and
when a fix doesn't make it, we just retarget it. This way we don't just have a
list of what we "wanted" to do, we can go back and figure out what was actually
done. Thats one of the main arguments for having BZ.
Senior Software Engineer
More information about the torquedev