[torquedev] torque bugzilla

Craig Macdonald craigm at dcs.gla.ac.uk
Tue Jan 6 11:58:32 MST 2009

Some organisations are moving to/using JIRA, instead of Bugzilla. Would 
anyone here consider this instead?


Joshua Bernstein wrote:
> Glen Beane wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org> wrote:
>>> ----- "Joshua Bernstein" <jbernstein at penguincomputing.com> wrote:
>>>> I agree completely. Ideally I think it might be wise to have a TORQUE
>>>> page on SourceForge.
>>> Torque is already taken there though..
>>>> This bugs can be marked public/private for the CRI internal folks.
>>> Oh dear god, please not the SourceForge bug tracking system!
>>> I've inherited it from the vacation program (which I need to
>>> get back to sometime soon) and I hate it with a vengeance.  It
>>> took me weeks to find the settings to get it to email me when
>>> people logged new bugs/feature requests and I still don't trust
>>> it..
>>>> Just a thought, but perhaps just the first step is a public
>>>> bugzilla.
>>> Agreed - I'd be much happier with a more vanilla bugzilla system.
>> seconded.   the TORQUE community is small, especially when you
>> consider developers.  I would rather use Bugzilla and the existing
>> mailing lists.
> Sounds like a plan then! Do we have a conscious? Josh Bu? What do you 
> think? Whats the next step?
> -Joshua Bernstein
> Software Engineer
> Penguin Computing
> _______________________________________________
> torquedev mailing list
> torquedev at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torquedev

More information about the torquedev mailing list