[torquedev] r1770 and r1771?
garrick at usc.edu
Tue Jan 29 14:33:57 MST 2008
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:12:27PM -0800, Garrick Staples alleged:
> I'm curious about the rational for r1770 and r1771. It doesn't look like it
> would pass the job's session id anymore. Why define a new resource?
I'm going to remove these changes, and the code that they fix. I can't find
a reason for them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20080129/dbdb32e5/attachment.bin
More information about the torquedev