[torquedev] Re: [torqueusers] Non-cummulative pbsnodes -o command

Glen Beane glen.beane at gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 19:43:26 MST 2008


On Feb 13, 2008 9:38 PM, Garrick Staples <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:37:49PM -0500, Glen Beane alleged:
> > sorry,  meant to send this to the list
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2008 7:37 PM, Glen Beane <glen.beane at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think I remember behavior like this with OpenPBS and PBS Pro if you
> > > marked a node as "down" with pbsnodes.  You can't even do that anymore
> (at
> > > least with torque, not sure with PBS Pro)
> > >
> > > something like
> > >
> > > pbsnodes -d node1
> > >  pbsnodes -l
> > > node2      down
> > > pbsnodes -d node2
> > > pbsnodes -l
> > > node2      down
> > >
> > > pbsnodes -d node1 node2
> > > pbsnodes -l
> > > node1            down
> > > node2            down
> > >
> > >
> > > but that was a long time ago,   I might be making this all up :)
> > >
> > > I do know pbsnodes -o works as expected for me
> > >
>
> Yes, the -d flag works like that.  It is freaking bizarre.
>
> Does anyone use that flag?  I don't think it has any meaning anymore.
>

it doesn't seem to mark it as down anymore, in fact I don't think -d does
anything anymore:

from the manpage

     -d             Print MOM diagnosis on the listed nodes.  Not yet imple-
                      mented.  Use momctl instead.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20080213/7be57750/attachment.html


More information about the torquedev mailing list