[torquedev] Re: [torqueusers] Allocating resources by CPUs
csamuel at vpac.org
Sun Mar 18 20:56:31 MDT 2007
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Glen Beane wrote:
> I agree that we should add a '-l cpus=x' option to torque
[catching up again]
Thinking further what we could really do with is a way to tell Maui & Moab to
do the right thing, rather than extending the RM (and then extending the
scheduler to cope).
Perhaps add another JOBNODEMATCHPOLICY option, perhaps ALMOSTEXACTNODE ?
Then a job that asks for nodes=N get N cpus and a job that asks nodes=N:ppn=x
gets what it asked for.
Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager
Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/
Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/torquedev/attachments/20070319/a34d949b/attachment.bin
More information about the torquedev