[Mauiusers] Jobs going into incorrect queue

Greenseid, Joseph M (IS) Joseph.Greenseid at ngc.com
Tue Apr 21 12:07:28 MDT 2009


what's the full output of `qmgr -c "print server"`?  
 
--Joe

________________________________

From: mauiusers-bounces at supercluster.org on behalf of Philip Peartree
Sent: Tue 4/21/2009 1:06 PM
To: mauiusers at supercluster.org; torqueusers at supercluster.org
Subject: Re: [Mauiusers] Jobs going into incorrect queue



The default queue is the routing queue, which should place the job 
based on allowed time, that is why it's so puzzling that the jobs end 
up in the short_2h queue, as they should be rejected by that and 
others until it reaches the unspec queue.


Quoting "Greenseid, Joseph M (IS)" <Joseph.Greenseid at ngc.com>:

> have you tried to set the default queue (set server default_queue = 
> unspec) in qmgr?  this is how i route jobs that don't specify 
> resources to a default location...
>
> --Joe
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: mauiusers-bounces at supercluster.org on behalf of Philip Peartree
> Sent: Tue 4/21/2009 12:32 PM
> To: torqueusers at supercluster.org; mauiusers at supercluster.org
> Subject: [Mauiusers] Jobs going into incorrect queue
>
>
>
> Hi Guys
>
> I have a problem that jobs appear to be not routing to the correct
> queue. My set up is as follows:
>
> routing queue
> 2h queue
> 12h queue
> 1w queue
> unspecified time queue (max time 2w)
> guest queue (low priority)
>
> If a time is unspecified at job submission a default time of 2w (336h) is set
>
> The routing queue is setup as follows (as taken from qmgr -c 'print server')
>
> create queue route
> set queue route queue_type = Route
> set queue route route_destinations = short_2h
> set queue route route_destinations += med_12h
> set queue route route_destinations += long_1w
> set queue route route_destinations += unspec
> set queue route route_destinations += guest
> set queue route enabled = True
> set queue route started = True
>
> my problem is that some jobs with unspecified time (which have
> correctly been given a time of 336h) are ending up in the short_2h
> queue, which has a higher priority than other queues. Does anyone know
> of any possible explanation for this?
>
> Phil Peartree
> University of Manchester
>
> _______________________________________________
> mauiusers mailing list
> mauiusers at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers
>
>
>



_______________________________________________
mauiusers mailing list
mauiusers at supercluster.org
http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/mauiusers


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/mauiusers/attachments/20090421/e5a3cc37/attachment.html 


More information about the mauiusers mailing list