From eirik.thorsnes at uni.no  Thu Dec  1 05:58:16 2011
From: eirik.thorsnes at uni.no (Eirik Thorsnes)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:58:16 +0100
Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong allocation
	deletion
Message-ID: <4ED779E8.7030703@uni.no>

Hello all,

What is the best way to correct the gbalance output after an allocation 
was wrongly deleted (and replaced)?

Situation:
1. Needed to change several currently valid and active allocations (both 
increasing and decreasing values).

2. The allocations where deleted with grmalloc and new correct 
allocations created for the same accounts using gdeposit.

3. The result (perhaps unsurprisingly after the fact) is that the 
columns in gbalance on the now valid and active allocations are not 
reflecting the usage that was made on the previous (deleted) allocations.

How can we correct this in the "Gold way"?

Our current Gold version is 2.1.10.0.

Best regards,
Eirik
-- 
Eirik Thorsnes
Group Leader at Parallab, Uni Computing
H?yteknologisenteret, Thorm?hlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
tel: (+47) 555 84153  fax: (+47) 555 84295

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Thu Dec  1 10:14:18 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:14:18 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong
	allocation	deletion
In-Reply-To: <4ED779E8.7030703@uni.no>
Message-ID: <f39dff0c-6822-423a-bd1f-b401a79009e3@mail>

Well, if I understand you correctly, what I think you should have done is to have made withdrawals or deposits against the allocations to increment or decrement them with the appropriate amounts. You could also have done a transfer if you were going from one to another.

For example,

# Initial allocation

$ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
Id Name    Balance  Deposited 
-- ------- -------- --------- 
1  biology 25000000  25000000 

# Some usage charges

$ gcharge -p biology -u amy -z 10000000 -J testjob
Successfully charged 10000000 credits for instance testjob and created usage record 3

# Balance after usage

$ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
Id Name    Balance  Deposited 
-- ------- -------- --------- 
1  biology 15000000  25000000 

# List allocations to see which allocation to deposit to

$ glsalloc -p biology
Id Account Active StartTime  EndTime    Amount   CreditLimit Deposited Description 
-- ------- ------ ---------- ---------- -------- ----------- --------- ---------1  1       False  2011-01-01 2011-04-01 25000000           0  25000000             
2  1       False  2011-04-01 2011-07-01 25000000           0  25000000             
3  1       False  2011-07-01 2011-10-01 25000000           0  25000000             
4  1       True   2011-10-01 2012-01-01 15000000           0  25000000   

# Augment the allocation

$ gdeposit -i 4 -z 5000000
Successfully deposited 5000000 credits into account 1

# Adjusted balance and total deposited amount

$ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
Id Name    Balance  Deposited 
-- ------- -------- --------- 
1  biology 20000000  30000000 

Scott



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eirik Thorsnes" <eirik.thorsnes at uni.no>
> To: "Gold Users Mailing List" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 5:58:16 AM
> Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong allocation	deletion
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> What is the best way to correct the gbalance output after an
> allocation
> was wrongly deleted (and replaced)?
> 
> Situation:
> 1. Needed to change several currently valid and active allocations
> (both
> increasing and decreasing values).
> 
> 2. The allocations where deleted with grmalloc and new correct
> allocations created for the same accounts using gdeposit.
> 
> 3. The result (perhaps unsurprisingly after the fact) is that the
> columns in gbalance on the now valid and active allocations are not
> reflecting the usage that was made on the previous (deleted)
> allocations.
> 
> How can we correct this in the "Gold way"?
> 
> Our current Gold version is 2.1.10.0.
> 
> Best regards,
> Eirik
> --
> Eirik Thorsnes
> Group Leader at Parallab, Uni Computing
> H?yteknologisenteret, Thorm?hlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
> tel: (+47) 555 84153  fax: (+47) 555 84295
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 

From Alexander.Oltu at uni.no  Tue Dec  6 08:16:26 2011
From: Alexander.Oltu at uni.no (Alexander Oltu)
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:16:26 +0100
Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong allocation
 deletion
In-Reply-To: <f39dff0c-6822-423a-bd1f-b401a79009e3@mail>
References: <4ED779E8.7030703@uni.no>
	<f39dff0c-6822-423a-bd1f-b401a79009e3@mail>
Message-ID: <20111206161626.13233a1f@korstorn.bccs.uib.no>

Scott, thanks! 

I am taking over fixing this issue.

Is there a way to recover deleted allocations by using goldsh? 
I see that I can change field "deleted" in the g_allocation table, but I
hope there is a "goldsh way", because I am afraid there should be
several tables connected to it.

thanks,
Alex.

On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:14:18 -0700 (MST)
Scott Jackson wrote:

> Well, if I understand you correctly, what I think you should have
> done is to have made withdrawals or deposits against the allocations
> to increment or decrement them with the appropriate amounts. You
> could also have done a transfer if you were going from one to another.
> 
> For example,
> 
> # Initial allocation
> 
> $ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
> Id Name    Balance  Deposited 
> -- ------- -------- --------- 
> 1  biology 25000000  25000000 
> 
> # Some usage charges
> 
> $ gcharge -p biology -u amy -z 10000000 -J testjob
> Successfully charged 10000000 credits for instance testjob and
> created usage record 3
> 
> # Balance after usage
> 
> $ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
> Id Name    Balance  Deposited 
> -- ------- -------- --------- 
> 1  biology 15000000  25000000 
> 
> # List allocations to see which allocation to deposit to
> 
> $ glsalloc -p biology
> Id Account Active StartTime  EndTime    Amount   CreditLimit
> Deposited Description -- ------- ------ ---------- ----------
> -------- ----------- --------- ---------1  1       False  2011-01-01
> 2011-04-01 25000000           0  25000000 2  1       False
> 2011-04-01 2011-07-01 25000000           0  25000000 3  1
> False  2011-07-01 2011-10-01 25000000           0  25000000 4
> 1       True   2011-10-01 2012-01-01 15000000           0  25000000   
> 
> # Augment the allocation
> 
> $ gdeposit -i 4 -z 5000000
> Successfully deposited 5000000 credits into account 1
> 
> # Adjusted balance and total deposited amount
> 
> $ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
> Id Name    Balance  Deposited 
> -- ------- -------- --------- 
> 1  biology 20000000  30000000 
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Eirik Thorsnes" <eirik.thorsnes at uni.no>
> > To: "Gold Users Mailing List" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 5:58:16 AM
> > Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong
> > allocation	deletion
> > 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > What is the best way to correct the gbalance output after an
> > allocation
> > was wrongly deleted (and replaced)?
> > 
> > Situation:
> > 1. Needed to change several currently valid and active allocations
> > (both
> > increasing and decreasing values).
> > 
> > 2. The allocations where deleted with grmalloc and new correct
> > allocations created for the same accounts using gdeposit.
> > 
> > 3. The result (perhaps unsurprisingly after the fact) is that the
> > columns in gbalance on the now valid and active allocations are not
> > reflecting the usage that was made on the previous (deleted)
> > allocations.
> > 
> > How can we correct this in the "Gold way"?
> > 
> > Our current Gold version is 2.1.10.0.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Eirik
> > --
> > Eirik Thorsnes
> > Group Leader at Parallab, Uni Computing
> > H?yteknologisenteret, Thorm?hlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
> > tel: (+47) 555 84153  fax: (+47) 555 84295
> > _______________________________________________
> > gold-users mailing list
> > gold-users at supercluster.org
> > http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users


-- 
Alexander Oltu
System Engineer
Parallab, Uni Computing

HIB, Thorm?hlensgt.55
N-5008 Bergen, Norway
phone: +47 55584144

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Tue Dec  6 09:39:13 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:39:13 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong allocation
	deletion
In-Reply-To: <20111206161626.13233a1f@korstorn.bccs.uib.no>
Message-ID: <36beda55-2de1-4d9e-b4cd-f0ffa957c41c@mail>

Yea, sure.

goldsh Allocation Undelete Id==4

Scott


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexander Oltu" <Alexander.Oltu at uni.no>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2011 8:16:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong allocation deletion
> 
> Scott, thanks!
> 
> I am taking over fixing this issue.
> 
> Is there a way to recover deleted allocations by using goldsh?
> I see that I can change field "deleted" in the g_allocation table,
> but I
> hope there is a "goldsh way", because I am afraid there should be
> several tables connected to it.
> 
> thanks,
> Alex.
> 
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:14:18 -0700 (MST)
> Scott Jackson wrote:
> 
> > Well, if I understand you correctly, what I think you should have
> > done is to have made withdrawals or deposits against the
> > allocations
> > to increment or decrement them with the appropriate amounts. You
> > could also have done a transfer if you were going from one to
> > another.
> > 
> > For example,
> > 
> > # Initial allocation
> > 
> > $ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
> > Id Name    Balance  Deposited
> > -- ------- -------- ---------
> > 1  biology 25000000  25000000
> > 
> > # Some usage charges
> > 
> > $ gcharge -p biology -u amy -z 10000000 -J testjob
> > Successfully charged 10000000 credits for instance testjob and
> > created usage record 3
> > 
> > # Balance after usage
> > 
> > $ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
> > Id Name    Balance  Deposited
> > -- ------- -------- ---------
> > 1  biology 15000000  25000000
> > 
> > # List allocations to see which allocation to deposit to
> > 
> > $ glsalloc -p biology
> > Id Account Active StartTime  EndTime    Amount   CreditLimit
> > Deposited Description -- ------- ------ ---------- ----------
> > -------- ----------- --------- ---------1  1       False
> >  2011-01-01
> > 2011-04-01 25000000           0  25000000 2  1       False
> > 2011-04-01 2011-07-01 25000000           0  25000000 3  1
> > False  2011-07-01 2011-10-01 25000000           0  25000000 4
> > 1       True   2011-10-01 2012-01-01 15000000           0  25000000
> > 
> > # Augment the allocation
> > 
> > $ gdeposit -i 4 -z 5000000
> > Successfully deposited 5000000 credits into account 1
> > 
> > # Adjusted balance and total deposited amount
> > 
> > $ gbalance -p biology --show Id,Name,Balance,Deposited
> > Id Name    Balance  Deposited
> > -- ------- -------- ---------
> > 1  biology 20000000  30000000
> > 
> > Scott
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Eirik Thorsnes" <eirik.thorsnes at uni.no>
> > > To: "Gold Users Mailing List" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 5:58:16 AM
> > > Subject: [gold-users] Correcting gbalance output after wrong
> > > allocation	deletion
> > > 
> > > Hello all,
> > > 
> > > What is the best way to correct the gbalance output after an
> > > allocation
> > > was wrongly deleted (and replaced)?
> > > 
> > > Situation:
> > > 1. Needed to change several currently valid and active
> > > allocations
> > > (both
> > > increasing and decreasing values).
> > > 
> > > 2. The allocations where deleted with grmalloc and new correct
> > > allocations created for the same accounts using gdeposit.
> > > 
> > > 3. The result (perhaps unsurprisingly after the fact) is that the
> > > columns in gbalance on the now valid and active allocations are
> > > not
> > > reflecting the usage that was made on the previous (deleted)
> > > allocations.
> > > 
> > > How can we correct this in the "Gold way"?
> > > 
> > > Our current Gold version is 2.1.10.0.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Eirik
> > > --
> > > Eirik Thorsnes
> > > Group Leader at Parallab, Uni Computing
> > > H?yteknologisenteret, Thorm?hlensgate 55, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
> > > tel: (+47) 555 84153  fax: (+47) 555 84295
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gold-users mailing list
> > > gold-users at supercluster.org
> > > http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gold-users mailing list
> > gold-users at supercluster.org
> > http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 
> 
> --
> Alexander Oltu
> System Engineer
> Parallab, Uni Computing
> 
> HIB, Thorm?hlensgt.55
> N-5008 Bergen, Norway
> phone: +47 55584144
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 

From akshar.bhosale at gmail.com  Wed Dec  7 19:05:14 2011
From: akshar.bhosale at gmail.com (akshar bhosale)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 07:35:14 +0530
Subject: [gold-users] clearing blocked(reserved) cpu time
Message-ID: <CANaMn14j8BkNkbT+=otHg7mZzdgYYWyR_Oc7MgrCopMpZ2beqw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

       We are using PBS (torque 2.4.8) and gold version 2.1.7.1 and
maui 3.2.6p20 on rhel 5.2. we want to clear reserved cpu time for a
particular user even though there are no earlier/current reservations
seen for that particular user. As most ofr the cputime is seen in
reserved state, user can not run his job. How to deal with such issue?
How to avoid such situation in future?This is live setup. Why this
must be happeneing?

From samuel at unimelb.edu.au  Wed Dec  7 19:10:54 2011
From: samuel at unimelb.edu.au (Christopher Samuel)
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:10:54 +1100
Subject: [gold-users] clearing blocked(reserved) cpu time
In-Reply-To: <CANaMn14j8BkNkbT+=otHg7mZzdgYYWyR_Oc7MgrCopMpZ2beqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANaMn14j8BkNkbT+=otHg7mZzdgYYWyR_Oc7MgrCopMpZ2beqw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4EE01CAE.5000307@unimelb.edu.au>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/12/11 13:05, akshar bhosale wrote:

>        We are using PBS (torque 2.4.8) and gold version 2.1.7.1 and
> maui 3.2.6p20 on rhel 5.2. we want to clear reserved cpu time for a
> particular user even though there are no earlier/current reservations
> seen for that particular user. As most ofr the cputime is seen in
> reserved state, user can not run his job. How to deal with such issue?
> How to avoid such situation in future?This is live setup. Why this
> must be happeneing?

Are your tables in MySQL using MyISAM rather than InnoDB by some chance?

That bit us, you *must* go in and alter your table types to InnoDB once
you've created them (if you are using MySQL) as transactions (which Gold
relies on) are not implemented in MyISAM.

cheers,
Chris
- -- 
    Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
 VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
 Email: samuel at unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
         http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7gHK4ACgkQO2KABBYQAh+VMwCfdnWUQo3HDYYowAIaD64YoEBR
d5UAoIEbCONcykBexVSnvrNGDA6RZ/Tf
=dv+W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Thu Dec  8 09:32:34 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:32:34 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] clearing blocked(reserved) cpu time
In-Reply-To: <4EE01CAE.5000307@unimelb.edu.au>
Message-ID: <9070c137-bf76-44fb-8498-552f78c6442f@mail>

To delete reservations from user scottmo:

goldsh Reservation Delete User==scottmo


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Samuel" <samuel at unimelb.edu.au>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 7:10:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [gold-users] clearing blocked(reserved) cpu time
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 08/12/11 13:05, akshar bhosale wrote:
> 
> >        We are using PBS (torque 2.4.8) and gold version 2.1.7.1 and
> > maui 3.2.6p20 on rhel 5.2. we want to clear reserved cpu time for a
> > particular user even though there are no earlier/current
> > reservations
> > seen for that particular user.

What do you mean by this? How would you clear a reservation if there isn't one?

> > As most ofr the cputime is seen in
> > reserved state, user can not run his job. How to deal with such
> > issue?

Please display some outputs that show evidence of your problem.

> > How to avoid such situation in future?This is live setup. Why this
> > must be happeneing?
> 
> Are your tables in MySQL using MyISAM rather than InnoDB by some
> chance?
> 
> That bit us, you *must* go in and alter your table types to InnoDB
> once
> you've created them (if you are using MySQL) as transactions (which
> Gold
> relies on) are not implemented in MyISAM.
> 
> cheers,
> Chris
> - --
>     Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
>  VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
>  Email: samuel at unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
>          http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk7gHK4ACgkQO2KABBYQAh+VMwCfdnWUQo3HDYYowAIaD64YoEBR
> d5UAoIEbCONcykBexVSnvrNGDA6RZ/Tf
> =dv+W
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 

From dheerajkv at aol.com  Mon Dec 19 01:02:43 2011
From: dheerajkv at aol.com (Dheeraj Kv)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 03:02:43 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server
Message-ID: <8CE8C3BB8DF70B8-AD4-B6BA9@Webmail-m125.sysops.aol.com>

Hi


            I have two different clusters. Both is running gold as accounting software with two different gold database and gold server.
Now I want a centralized database  for Gold. Is it possible for me to shift database  to a central server and have two gold servers (goldd)  updating the same database. I need to know whether will there be any  inconsistency in the data uploaded by different servers on the same database.
I could find out a g_transaction_id in the database, which increments on each update. Will this id get  mismatch  or duplicated if two gold servers update on the same database. Any help is much appreciated. 


Regards

Dheeraj KV

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111219/78438142/attachment.html 

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Mon Dec 19 09:22:25 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:22:25 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server
In-Reply-To: <8CE8C3BB8DF70B8-AD4-B6BA9@Webmail-m125.sysops.aol.com>
Message-ID: <59185cf8-6c70-43ab-a440-42226415c0b0@mail>

Yes, you can do that. This is according to design. There should not be any inconsistency since Gold uses transactions. Make sure if you are running mysql that it is using a Transaction-enabled engine such as InnoDB. Postgres enables transactions by default. There should be no problem with the transaction id for the same reason. 

Scott 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Dheeraj Kv" <dheerajkv at aol.com>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:02:43 AM
> Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server

> Hi

> I have two different clusters. Both is running gold as accounting
> software with two different gold database and gold server.
> Now I want a centralized database for Gold. Is it possible for me to
> shift database to a central server and have two gold servers (goldd)
> updating the same database. I need to know whether will there be any
> inconsistency in the data uploaded by different servers on the same
> database.
> I could find out a g_transaction_id in the database, which increments
> on each update. Will this id get mismatch or duplicated if two gold
> servers update on the same database. Any help is much appreciated.

> Regards

> Dheeraj KV

> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111219/3fb1c340/attachment-0001.html 

From vaishalidolas at gmail.com  Tue Dec 20 03:24:57 2011
From: vaishalidolas at gmail.com (Vaishali Dolas)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:54:57 +0530
Subject: [gold-users] windows cluster accounting in gold allocation manager
Message-ID: <CAFOQv4n_ww1PCKLfzs0h+n=Vpv5DO+Abw_e3T8pywdUCZO+qmw@mail.gmail.com>

*Hi,*
* Is there any plan or road map of making support for windows cluster
 accounting in gold allocation manager ?*
*
*

-- 
   *          Best Regards,
             Vaishali Dolas
**
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111220/b24ab4e8/attachment.html 

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Tue Dec 20 09:53:02 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:53:02 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] windows cluster accounting in gold allocation
	manager
In-Reply-To: <CAFOQv4n_ww1PCKLfzs0h+n=Vpv5DO+Abw_e3T8pywdUCZO+qmw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f6d85e68-08cc-412c-afba-bb900a7d5911@mail>

There are no current plans to make Gold run on a Windows operating system. 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Vaishali Dolas" <vaishalidolas at gmail.com>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 3:24:57 AM
> Subject: [gold-users] windows cluster accounting in gold allocation
> manager

> Hi,
> Is there any plan or road map of making support for windows cluster
> accounting in gold allocation manager ?

> --
> Best Regards,
> Vaishali Dolas

> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111220/21b7f819/attachment.html 

From dheerajkv at aol.com  Tue Dec 20 23:18:26 2011
From: dheerajkv at aol.com (Dheeraj Kv)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:18:26 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server
In-Reply-To: <59185cf8-6c70-43ab-a440-42226415c0b0@mail>
References: <59185cf8-6c70-43ab-a440-42226415c0b0@mail>
Message-ID: <8CE8DBF7C1F7C43-22B4-119BBE@Webmail-m104.sysops.aol.com>

Hi


        Thanks for your valuable information. I have one more query regarding the same.
Currently the setup is a production one without Innodb, so when i enable Innodb in my.cnf, should I again recreate gold database or will it run with the currently running database itself.


Dheeraj KV




-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Jackson <scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com>
To: Gold Users Mailing List <gold-users at supercluster.org>
Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2011 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server


Yes, you can do that. This is according to design. There should not be any inconsistency since Gold uses transactions. Make sure if you are running mysql that it is using a Transaction-enabled engine such as InnoDB. Postgres enables transactions by default. There should be no problem with the transaction id for the same reason.

Scott




From: "Dheeraj Kv" <dheerajkv at aol.com>
To: gold-users at supercluster.org
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:02:43 AM
Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server

Hi


            I have two different clusters. Both is running gold as accounting software with two different gold database and gold server.
Now I want a centralized database  for Gold. Is it possible for me to shift database  to a central server and have two gold servers (goldd)  updating the same database. I need to know whether will there be any  inconsistency in the data uploaded by different servers on the same database.
I could find out a g_transaction_id in the database, which increments on each update. Will this id get  mismatch  or duplicated if two gold servers update on the same database. Any help is much appreciated. 


Regards

Dheeraj KV


_______________________________________________
gold-users mailing list
gold-users at supercluster.org
http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users



 
_______________________________________________
gold-users mailing list
gold-users at supercluster.org
http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/c1177fa9/attachment.html 

From vanw at sabalcore.com  Wed Dec 21 07:58:43 2011
From: vanw at sabalcore.com (Kevin Van Workum)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:58:43 -0500
Subject: [gold-users] gdeposit and new allocation description
Message-ID: <CAHom8ysZKCK1NAJ2GS_Zg=RKU4ait64C79W=ZQMrmvggTzoMrA@mail.gmail.com>

When using gdeposit to make a new allocation, I would like the new
allocation's Description to be the description provided to gdeposit via the
-d option. Currently the new allocation has no description, only the
deposit's transaction. I have modified Bank.pm to do this, but was
wondering if you could foresee any problems with this change? So far it
seems to be working, but I haven't done anything close to a full test.

[root at jman Gold]# diff -c Bank.pm.orig Bank.pm
*** Bank.pm.orig        2011-12-21 09:52:46.000000000 -0500
--- Bank.pm     2011-12-21 09:50:39.000000000 -0500
***************
*** 4635,4640 ****
--- 4635,4641 ----
      my $database    = $request->getDatabase();
      my $dbh         = $database->{_handle};
      my $amount      = $request->getOptionValue("Amount");
+     my $description = $request->getOptionValue("Description");
      my $id          = $request->getOptionValue("Id");
      my $allocation  = $request->getOptionValue("Allocation");
      my $creditLimit = $request->getOptionValue("CreditLimit") || 0;
***************
*** 4946,4951 ****
--- 4947,4956 ----
                          value => $creditLimit
                      ),
                      new Gold::Assignment(
+                       name  => "Description",
+                       value => $description
+                     ),
+                     new Gold::Assignment(
                          name  => "Active",
                          value => $activeness
                      )

-- 
Kevin Van Workum, PhD
Sabalcore Computing Inc.
Run your code on 500 processors.
Sign up for a free trial account.
www.sabalcore.com
877-492-8027 ext. 11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/686f9a73/attachment.html 

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Wed Dec 21 10:13:51 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:13:51 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] gdeposit and new allocation description
In-Reply-To: <CAHom8ysZKCK1NAJ2GS_Zg=RKU4ait64C79W=ZQMrmvggTzoMrA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <04ee3d96-a98a-4b7d-a64c-6fd2362ef9f4@mail>

Kevin, 

The only problem you might run into is what is it going to do if you do not pass in a description? Is it going to have a problem with an unitialized value? I would probably only add the assignment if it is non-null/non-empty. You might also want to consider whether you want to add it to the case where you are depositing to an existing allocation to clobber the previous value. My thinking around this has been that any number of transactions might affect a single allocation (deposits, withdrawals, transfers, etc.) and that if they have descriptions for the transaction, they should go on the transaction instead of clobbering the description on the allocation. However, admittedly there is not an easy way to set the description when an allocation is created via a deposit (since I have disabled Allocation Create). 

Scott 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Kevin Van Workum" <vanw at sabalcore.com>
> To: "gold-users" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 7:58:43 AM
> Subject: [gold-users] gdeposit and new allocation description

> When using gdeposit to make a new allocation, I would like the new
> allocation's Description to be the description provided to gdeposit
> via the -d option. Currently the new allocation has no description,
> only the deposit's transaction. I have modified Bank.pm to do this,
> but was wondering if you could foresee any problems with this
> change? So far it seems to be working, but I haven't done anything
> close to a full test.

> [root at jman Gold]# diff -c Bank.pm.orig Bank.pm
> *** Bank.pm.orig 2011-12-21 09:52:46.000000000 -0500
> --- Bank.pm 2011-12-21 09:50:39.000000000 -0500
> ***************
> *** 4635,4640 ****
> --- 4635,4641 ----
> my $database = $request->getDatabase();
> my $dbh = $database->{_handle};
> my $amount = $request->getOptionValue("Amount");
> + my $description = $request->getOptionValue("Description");
> my $id = $request->getOptionValue("Id");
> my $allocation = $request->getOptionValue("Allocation");
> my $creditLimit = $request->getOptionValue("CreditLimit") || 0;
> ***************
> *** 4946,4951 ****
> --- 4947,4956 ----
> value => $creditLimit
> ),
> new Gold::Assignment(
> + name => "Description",
> + value => $description
> + ),
> + new Gold::Assignment(
> name => "Active",
> value => $activeness
> )

> --
> Kevin Van Workum, PhD
> Sabalcore Computing Inc.
> Run your code on 500 processors.
> Sign up for a free trial account.
> www.sabalcore.com

> 877-492-8027 ext. 11

> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/fcbc62ce/attachment-0001.html 

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Wed Dec 21 10:19:11 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:19:11 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server
In-Reply-To: <8CE8DBF7C1F7C43-22B4-119BBE@Webmail-m104.sysops.aol.com>
Message-ID: <4d944822-37e5-4dbd-9416-f58b48b6cd8d@mail>

Dheeraj, 

No, you should not need to recreate the tables. 

The MySQL database, prior to version 5.5.5, does not use a transaction safe storage engine by default. You must configure your MySQL server to use a transaction-safe storage engine such as InnoDB . This can be accomplished by setting the parameter default-storage-engine = INNODB in your my.cnf file under the [mysqld] section and restarting mysql. 

For example: 

# vi /etc/mysql/my.cnf 
[mysqld] 
default-storage-engine = INNODB 

Other options include using the --default-storage-engine= INNODB server startup option, or altering all of your Gold tables to specify the INNODB storage engine (i.e. ALTER TABLE t ENGINE = INNODB ). 

To see what storage engines are supported, which support transactions and which one is currently 
being used as the default use the "show engines" command at the mysql prompt: 

mysql> show engines; 
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+ 
| Engine | Support | Comment | Transactions | XA | Savepoints | 
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+ 
| InnoDB | YES | Supports transactions, row-level locking, and foreign keys | YES | YES | YES | 
| MyISAM | DEFAULT | Default engine as of MySQL 3.23 with great performance | NO | NO | NO | 
+------------+---------+----------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+------+------------+ 

Future releases of Gold will include this step in the installation instructions. 

Scott 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Dheeraj Kv" <dheerajkv at aol.com>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:18:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server

> Hi

> Thanks for your valuable information. I have one more query regarding
> the same.
> Currently the setup is a production one without Innodb, so when i
> enable Innodb in my.cnf, should I again recreate gold database or
> will it run with the currently running database itself.

> Dheeraj KV

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Jackson <scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com>
> To: Gold Users Mailing List <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> Sent: Mon, Dec 19, 2011 4:52 pm
> Subject: Re: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server

> Yes, you can do that. This is according to design. There should not
> be any inconsistency since Gold uses transactions. Make sure if you
> are running mysql that it is using a Transaction-enabled engine such
> as InnoDB. Postgres enables transactions by default. There should be
> no problem with the transaction id for the same reason.

> Scott

> ----- Original Message -----

> > From: "Dheeraj Kv" < dheerajkv at aol.com >
> 
> > To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> 
> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:02:43 AM
> 
> > Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server
> 

> > Hi
> 

> > I have two different clusters. Both is running gold as accounting
> > software with two different gold database and gold server.
> 
> > Now I want a centralized database for Gold. Is it possible for me
> > to
> > shift database to a central server and have two gold servers
> > (goldd)
> > updating the same database. I need to know whether will there be
> > any
> > inconsistency in the data uploaded by different servers on the same
> > database.
> 
> > I could find out a g_transaction_id in the database, which
> > increments
> > on each update. Will this id get mismatch or duplicated if two gold
> > servers update on the same database. Any help is much appreciated.
> 

> > Regards
> 

> > Dheeraj KV
> 

> > _______________________________________________
> 
> > gold-users mailing list
> 
> > gold-users at supercluster.org
> 
> > http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 

> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/da4164f2/attachment.html 

From vanw at sabalcore.com  Wed Dec 21 10:56:51 2011
From: vanw at sabalcore.com (Kevin Van Workum)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:56:51 -0500
Subject: [gold-users] gdeposit and new allocation description
In-Reply-To: <04ee3d96-a98a-4b7d-a64c-6fd2362ef9f4@mail>
References: <CAHom8ysZKCK1NAJ2GS_Zg=RKU4ait64C79W=ZQMrmvggTzoMrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<04ee3d96-a98a-4b7d-a64c-6fd2362ef9f4@mail>
Message-ID: <CAHom8ytm9ka7nWBiGDG9r0fkHiUu+c2DS9ckQa9CKCdUg_7GOg@mail.gmail.com>

Scott,

It seems to be fine when not passing in a description, but it would be wise
to do as you suggest.

I also agree that clobbering the description of an existing allocation via
gdeposit would not be very user friendly. But I do think a way to set the
allocation's description when it is created via gdeposit is a desirable
feature. Maybe a new option to gdeposit (-D) that allows you to update the
allocation's description for new or existing allocations would work well.

Kevin

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Scott Jackson <
scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com> wrote:

> Kevin,
>
> The only problem you might run into is what is it going to do if you do
> not pass in a description? Is it going to have a problem with an
> unitialized value? I would  probably only add the assignment if it is
> non-null/non-empty. You might also want to consider whether you want to add
> it to the case where you are depositing to an existing allocation to
> clobber the previous value. My thinking around this has been that any
> number of transactions might affect a single allocation (deposits,
> withdrawals, transfers, etc.) and that if they have descriptions for the
> transaction, they should go on the transaction instead of clobbering the
> description on the allocation. However, admittedly there is not an easy way
> to set the description when an allocation is created via a deposit (since I
> have disabled Allocation Create).
>
> Scott
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Kevin Van Workum" <vanw at sabalcore.com>
> *To: *"gold-users" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 21, 2011 7:58:43 AM
> *Subject: *[gold-users] gdeposit and new allocation description
>
>
> When using gdeposit to make a new allocation, I would like the new
> allocation's Description to be the description provided to gdeposit via the
> -d option. Currently the new allocation has no description, only the
> deposit's transaction. I have modified Bank.pm to do this, but was
> wondering if you could foresee any problems with this change? So far it
> seems to be working, but I haven't done anything close to a full test.
>
> [root at jman Gold]# diff -c Bank.pm.orig Bank.pm
> *** Bank.pm.orig        2011-12-21 09:52:46.000000000 -0500
> --- Bank.pm     2011-12-21 09:50:39.000000000 -0500
> ***************
> *** 4635,4640 ****
> --- 4635,4641 ----
>       my $database    = $request->getDatabase();
>       my $dbh         = $database->{_handle};
>       my $amount      = $request->getOptionValue("Amount");
> +     my $description = $request->getOptionValue("Description");
>       my $id          = $request->getOptionValue("Id");
>       my $allocation  = $request->getOptionValue("Allocation");
>       my $creditLimit = $request->getOptionValue("CreditLimit") || 0;
> ***************
> *** 4946,4951 ****
> --- 4947,4956 ----
>                           value => $creditLimit
>                       ),
>                       new Gold::Assignment(
> +                       name  => "Description",
> +                       value => $description
> +                     ),
> +                     new Gold::Assignment(
>                           name  => "Active",
>                           value => $activeness
>                       )
>
> --
> Kevin Van Workum, PhD
> Sabalcore Computing Inc.
> Run your code on 500 processors.
> Sign up for a free trial account.
> www.sabalcore.com
> 877-492-8027 ext. 11
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
>
>


-- 
Kevin Van Workum, PhD
Sabalcore Computing Inc.
Run your code on 500 processors.
Sign up for a free trial account.
www.sabalcore.com
877-492-8027 ext. 11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/e93092b6/attachment.html 

From vanw at sabalcore.com  Wed Dec 21 14:32:34 2011
From: vanw at sabalcore.com (Kevin Van Workum)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:32:34 -0500
Subject: [gold-users] list accounts with no active allocations
Message-ID: <CAHom8yv-AtFm-V6FRMPSmHV1upY5XpCNaTco5gyPCYt=Mf7_RQ@mail.gmail.com>

"goldsh Account Query Active:=True" will list accounts with active
allocations and "goldsh Account Query Active:=False" will list accounts
with inactive allocations. But is there a oneliner to list account with no
active allocations?

-- 
Kevin Van Workum, PhD
Sabalcore Computing Inc.
Run your code on 500 processors.
Sign up for a free trial account.
www.sabalcore.com
877-492-8027 ext. 11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/62bee412/attachment-0001.html 

From cwest at vpac.org  Wed Dec 21 15:53:07 2011
From: cwest at vpac.org (Craig West)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:53:07 +1100
Subject: [gold-users] Incremental charging with Gold 2.2.X
Message-ID: <4EF26353.4020506@vpac.org>


Hello,

I see references to gold being able to charge incrementally during the 
life of a job but I can't find any documentation about how this is 
enabled or works.

Also, is this an available option in Moab yet?

Thanks,
Craig.

-- 
Craig West                   Systems Manager
Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
110 Victoria Street, Carlton South  VIC 3053
P: +61 3 9925 4751         E: cwest at vpac.org
                          http://www.vpac.org

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Wed Dec 21 16:32:39 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:32:39 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] list accounts with no active allocations
In-Reply-To: <CAHom8yv-AtFm-V6FRMPSmHV1upY5XpCNaTco5gyPCYt=Mf7_RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b078ca52-b1f7-489f-9693-4dbfd2b541e8@mail>

Kevin, 

No, there is not a one-liner in Gold to do this -- it is hard enough to do in SQL. But try this SQL query: 

psql gold -c "select g_id from g_account except select distinct g_account from g_allocation where g_active='True' order by g_id" 

Scott 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Kevin Van Workum" <vanw at sabalcore.com>
> To: "gold-users" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:32:34 PM
> Subject: [gold-users] list accounts with no active allocations

> "goldsh Account Query Active:=True" will list accounts with active
> allocations and "goldsh Account Query Active:=False" will list
> accounts with inactive allocations. But is there a oneliner to list
> account with no active allocations?

> --
> Kevin Van Workum, PhD
> Sabalcore Computing Inc.
> Run your code on 500 processors.
> Sign up for a free trial account.
> www.sabalcore.com

> 877-492-8027 ext. 11

> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111221/cc9d613b/attachment.html 

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Wed Dec 21 16:35:15 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:35:15 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] Incremental charging with Gold 2.2.X
In-Reply-To: <4EF26353.4020506@vpac.org>
Message-ID: <e149b247-ec92-4618-831b-92d231e30745@mail>

Craig,

Gold can support it, but AFAIK Moab currently only uses incremental charging in its cloud context.

Scott


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig West" <cwest at vpac.org>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:53:07 PM
> Subject: [gold-users] Incremental charging with Gold 2.2.X
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I see references to gold being able to charge incrementally during
> the
> life of a job but I can't find any documentation about how this is
> enabled or works.
> 
> Also, is this an available option in Moab yet?
> 
> Thanks,
> Craig.
> 
> --
> Craig West                   Systems Manager
> Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing
> 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South  VIC 3053
> P: +61 3 9925 4751         E: cwest at vpac.org
>                           http://www.vpac.org
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 

From samuel at unimelb.edu.au  Wed Dec 21 18:28:22 2011
From: samuel at unimelb.edu.au (Christopher Samuel)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:28:22 +1100
Subject: [gold-users] Incremental charging with Gold 2.2.X
In-Reply-To: <e149b247-ec92-4618-831b-92d231e30745@mail>
References: <e149b247-ec92-4618-831b-92d231e30745@mail>
Message-ID: <4EF287B6.1050207@unimelb.edu.au>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 22/12/11 10:35, Scott Jackson wrote:

> Gold can support it, but AFAIK Moab currently only uses
> incremental charging in its cloud context.

Doesn't the FLUSHINTERVAL in AMCFG directives do this?

http://www.adaptivecomputing.com/resources/docs/mwm/6-0/6.4allocationmanagement.php

# Indicates the amount of time between allocation manager
# debits for long running reservation and job based charges.

cheers,
Chris
- -- 
    Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
 VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
 Email: samuel at unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
         http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7yh7YACgkQO2KABBYQAh8TlgCfbn4R6Zbgvhx4eHsoviipMIYV
FyQAmwYRQr7m/e7g8AyZTm+vl4Nmu8Ds
=Z7UD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From samuel at unimelb.edu.au  Wed Dec 21 20:24:13 2011
From: samuel at unimelb.edu.au (Christopher Samuel)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:24:13 +1100
Subject: [gold-users] Same gold database and Multiple Server
In-Reply-To: <8CE8DBF7C1F7C43-22B4-119BBE@Webmail-m104.sysops.aol.com>
References: <59185cf8-6c70-43ab-a440-42226415c0b0@mail>
	<8CE8DBF7C1F7C43-22B4-119BBE@Webmail-m104.sysops.aol.com>
Message-ID: <4EF2A2DD.1000300@unimelb.edu.au>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 21/12/11 17:18, Dheeraj Kv wrote:

> Currently the setup is a production one without Innodb, so when i enable
> Innodb in my.cnf, should I again recreate gold database or will it run
> with the currently running database itself.

If you are using MySQL you can do an ALTER TABLE to change the backend
whilst its running.  We've had to do that in the past as Debian was
packaging MySQL 5.0 in Lenny, and Squeeze has 5.3.

cheers,
Chris
- -- 
    Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
 VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
 Email: samuel at unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
         http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7yot0ACgkQO2KABBYQAh/hlwCePP3oErptA/5OhLuMIlqPJzF8
f4cAn25QEtQrSZMrE+N9dzoBrRMU4W0P
=PY8V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

From vanw at sabalcore.com  Thu Dec 22 09:34:49 2011
From: vanw at sabalcore.com (Kevin Van Workum)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:34:49 -0500
Subject: [gold-users] list accounts with no active allocations
In-Reply-To: <b078ca52-b1f7-489f-9693-4dbfd2b541e8@mail>
References: <CAHom8yv-AtFm-V6FRMPSmHV1upY5XpCNaTco5gyPCYt=Mf7_RQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<b078ca52-b1f7-489f-9693-4dbfd2b541e8@mail>
Message-ID: <CAHom8ysOh10D__DfXcLiqDwTNc=vb69B24bVE__dx_AbBnmL7Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Scott Jackson <
scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com> wrote:

> Kevin,
>
> No, there is not a one-liner in Gold to do this -- it is hard enough to do
> in SQL. But try this SQL query:
>

That's what I figured.


>
> psql gold -c "select g_id from g_account except select distinct g_account
> from g_allocation where g_active='True' order by g_id"
>

This seems to list accounts with no active projects and no active
allocations. I actually want accounts with active projects and no active
allocations.


> Scott
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Kevin Van Workum" <vanw at sabalcore.com>
> *To: *"gold-users" <gold-users at supercluster.org>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:32:34 PM
> *Subject: *[gold-users] list accounts with no active allocations
>
>
> "goldsh Account Query Active:=True" will list accounts with active
> allocations and "goldsh Account Query Active:=False" will list accounts
> with inactive allocations. But is there a oneliner to list account with no
> active allocations?
>
> --
> Kevin Van Workum, PhD
> Sabalcore Computing Inc.
> Run your code on 500 processors.
> Sign up for a free trial account.
> www.sabalcore.com
> 877-492-8027 ext. 11
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
>
>


-- 
Kevin Van Workum, PhD
Sabalcore Computing Inc.
Run your code on 500 processors.
Sign up for a free trial account.
www.sabalcore.com
877-492-8027 ext. 11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111222/54076dc7/attachment.html 

From scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com  Thu Dec 22 13:43:04 2011
From: scottmo at adaptivecomputing.com (Scott Jackson)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:43:04 -0700 (MST)
Subject: [gold-users] Incremental charging with Gold 2.2.X
In-Reply-To: <4EF287B6.1050207@unimelb.edu.au>
Message-ID: <83232399-8b35-46ed-8158-26a82e7e5445@mail>

You're welcome to try it. To my knowledge it is only implemented in cloud. I hope that I am proven wrong.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Samuel" <samuel at unimelb.edu.au>
> To: gold-users at supercluster.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 6:28:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [gold-users] Incremental charging with Gold 2.2.X
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 22/12/11 10:35, Scott Jackson wrote:
> 
> > Gold can support it, but AFAIK Moab currently only uses
> > incremental charging in its cloud context.
> 
> Doesn't the FLUSHINTERVAL in AMCFG directives do this?
> 
> http://www.adaptivecomputing.com/resources/docs/mwm/6-0/6.4allocationmanagement.php
> 
> # Indicates the amount of time between allocation manager
> # debits for long running reservation and job based charges.
> 
> cheers,
> Chris
> - --
>     Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
>  VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
>  Email: samuel at unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
>          http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk7yh7YACgkQO2KABBYQAh8TlgCfbn4R6Zbgvhx4eHsoviipMIYV
> FyQAmwYRQr7m/e7g8AyZTm+vl4Nmu8Ds
> =Z7UD
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> gold-users mailing list
> gold-users at supercluster.org
> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gold-users
> 

From vanw at sabalcore.com  Tue Dec 27 09:39:25 2011
From: vanw at sabalcore.com (Kevin Van Workum)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:39:25 -0500
Subject: [gold-users] Show:= syntax
Message-ID: <CAHom8ysKA+QnWaZxnQsDA2wcmJkSUUx6K+dvQ9NjTaG=MHJtSQ@mail.gmail.com>

I can't for the life of me get this to work:

gold> Action Query Object==Account Show:=Sort(Name)
An operator was expected ()).

I tried all sorts of quoting, but nothing seems to work. What am I missing?

-- 
Kevin Van Workum, PhD
Sabalcore Computing Inc.
Run your code on 500 processors.
Sign up for a free trial account.
www.sabalcore.com
877-492-8027 ext. 11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111227/e4eb0620/attachment.html 

From vanw at sabalcore.com  Tue Dec 27 09:42:45 2011
From: vanw at sabalcore.com (Kevin Van Workum)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:42:45 -0500
Subject: [gold-users] Show:= syntax
In-Reply-To: <CAHom8ysKA+QnWaZxnQsDA2wcmJkSUUx6K+dvQ9NjTaG=MHJtSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHom8ysKA+QnWaZxnQsDA2wcmJkSUUx6K+dvQ9NjTaG=MHJtSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHom8yu3NMKsb_J8sj_Js++BjANz3iD4=KKJbJx5eDhthPpbJQ@mail.gmail.com>

Solved:

gold> Action Query Object==Account Show:="Sort(Name)"

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Kevin Van Workum <vanw at sabalcore.com>wrote:

> I can't for the life of me get this to work:
>
> gold> Action Query Object==Account Show:=Sort(Name)
> An operator was expected ()).
>
> I tried all sorts of quoting, but nothing seems to work. What am I missing?
>
> --
> Kevin Van Workum, PhD
> Sabalcore Computing Inc.
> Run your code on 500 processors.
> Sign up for a free trial account.
> www.sabalcore.com
> 877-492-8027 ext. 11
>
>


-- 
Kevin Van Workum, PhD
Sabalcore Computing Inc.
Run your code on 500 processors.
Sign up for a free trial account.
www.sabalcore.com
877-492-8027 ext. 11
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.supercluster.org/pipermail/gold-users/attachments/20111227/5665a704/attachment.html